A child comes home upset after a game and says, “Coach hates me.” An adult wakes up feeling tired and thinks, “Something must be wrong with me.” A parent hears their teen is distracted and immediately wonders about ADHD. In each of these situations, our minds tend to move toward the most dramatic explanation available. But often, the best starting point is much simpler. Does the coach really “hate” your child, or did your child do something at practice that warranted discipline? If you are tired, does it always mean something is wrong, or could it be that you only slept 2 hours last night? And is every distracted teen “ADHD,” or are they simply bored in classes they don’t like? Enter the importance of parsimony, and realizing that everything in life doesn’t have to be complex, or a conspiracy!
Understanding the value of parsimony
When I was in graduate school many moons ago, one of the most important concepts I learned was the principle of parsimony — the idea that when trying to understand a problem, we should favor the simplest adequate explanation before jumping to more complex conclusions. In science, this is often associated with the idea that we shouldn’t multiply assumptions unnecessarily. In everyday life, it simply means: don’t over-complicate things.
We are living in an era of information overload in what some would call the technology revolution. Social media offers instant diagnoses, viral explanations, and confident “expert” opinions about nearly everything — confirmation bias at every turn! The louder and more dramatic the explanation, the more attention it seems to attract. While that might be the formula to keep people tethered to social media, these are not the means scientists and helping professionals use to understand and treat problems. Instead, a more direct and likely approach is taken — regardless of whether the internet agrees.
For example, consider youth sports. A kid suddenly struggles during the season and you are pressed to understand why? The non-parsimonious explanations arrive quickly: sport burnout, poor coaching, deeper emotional issues, and clear evidence that the kid wants to quit sports. Yet the simplest, and most parsimonious explanation is that the kid is mentally and physically fatigued from a long travel sport season. Since it is very common for kids to struggle with motivation and focus at the end of an intense sport season, it is more responsible to start there when trying to come up with answers, versus assuming the kid is deeply depressed and on the verge of quitting. Common things occur commonly. Starting with the obvious is not dismissive — it’s responsible.
The same principle applies to mental health. Not every episode of sadness is clinical depression. Not every lapse in focus is ADHD. Not every bout of nervousness is an anxiety disorder. Human beings experience a wide range of normal emotional fluctuations. Parsimony helps us avoid turning every challenge into psychopathology.
This does not mean complex problems do not exist. They do. But effective problem-solving works best when we start simple and escalate only if necessary. When we skip that first step, we risk mislabeling issues, increasing anxiety, and overlooking practical solutions, and even creating new problems.
Parsimony is also a powerful emotional regulator. When we assume catastrophic explanations, we feel helpless. When we consider simple explanations, we often discover actionable solutions. Tired? Check sleep. Irritable? Check stress levels. Struggling at practice? Check workload and recovery. Very often simple solutions prove effective, and when they don’t, you can always escalate to the next level of inquiry.
Even if you re not a scientist or helping professional, parsimony can serve as a critical thinking safeguard. Before accepting an explanation — whether about health, sports, relationships, or world events — it helps to ask:
What is the simplest explanation that fits the facts?
Have I ruled out the common causes?
What assumptions am I making that perhaps I should revisit?
What actual evidence supports this conclusion? And perhaps most importantly, am I being objective (unbiased) when evaluating evidence?
In a world that rewards dramatic narratives, choosing simplicity can feel unsatisfying. But simplicity is often closer to truth, and truth is always more valuable than throwing out a theory because it sounds more complex.
Final thoughts
In an age of endless information and instant conclusions, the ability to pause and ask, “What’s the simplest explanation?” may be one of the most important thinking skills we can teach ourselves — and our kids. In order to do this we must remain objective, and steer away from confirmation bias. Employing parsimony does not mean you are taking a shortcut because you are lazy, but instead supports the idea that most issues we face in life are ones we have seen before, and that they are often simple in nature once diagnosed properly.
drstankovich.com
